TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
Return to Index ›
Re The new 'laws'
Former FT in China
- 2016-09-03
In response to Re The new 'laws' (Paul Fox)
Foxy, no watermark(s)! Oh dear!
Not good, I guess it wouldn't be hard to produce a forgery!
Good point! Fortunately, (for me), I am in a position to be able to address that issue. Watch this space mate.........
Foxy, I shall do so, mate. Thx for whetting my appetite.
Messages In This Thread
- The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-08-30
- Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-08-30
- Re The new 'laws' -- Sven Olafsen -- 2016-08-30
- Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-08-30
- Re The new 'laws' -- San Migs -- 2016-08-30
- Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-08-30
- Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-01
- Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-09-02
- Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-09-02
- Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-02
- Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-02
- Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-09-01
- Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-02
- Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-09-02
- Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-03
- Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-03
- Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-03
- Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-09-02
- Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-09-02
- Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-08-30
- Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-08-30
- Devil's advocate.... -- Paul Fox -- 2016-08-30
- Re Devil's advocate.... -- Guangxi Guy -- 2016-08-30
- Re Devil's advocate.... -- San Migs -- 2016-08-30
- Re Devil's advocate.... -- Former FT in China -- 2016-08-30
- Re Devil's advocate.... -- San Migs -- 2016-08-30
- Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-09-02
- Re The new 'laws' -- Sven Olafsen -- 2016-08-30
- Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-08-30
Return to Index ›
Re The new 'laws'