Yes, instead of shooting a few people here and there it's better to destroy 100 level towers, kill thousands of people and cause 150 billion dollars in immediate economic losses and a couple of hundred billion later on.

Not a bad effort the 2001 WTC attack, the first "failure bombing" in February 1993 "only killed 6 people" and only caused 2 billion in damage. Silly old Ramzi Yousef, 500-700 kg of TNT in a van., not good enough, he must be a failure of a terrorist according to libtard logic.

Or you can just bomb a marathon in Boston, that's not much good though, only killed four or five people and blew a few others arms and legs off. I suppose Americans shooting each other is more "uncivilized" than bombing some runners I guess. BMB was a "failure" not enough deaths and injuries for libtards, but still caused Boston to lose a billion dollars or so through lost productivity, closing down the city for a few days, etc.