TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
Return to Index ›
Re: Syllogisms
miffed
- 2011-12-08
T----i posts very very regularly on this board.Mods do so too on many boards.
So,T----i must be a moderator....LOL!
Strictly spoken, this syllogism is not quite correct in formal terms
I think it falls on Material fallacies under fallacy of accident or sweeping
generalizations or under irrelevant conclusion:forwarding the proposition
under dispute without any certain proof (argumentum ad ignorantiam).
Oh maybe I myself am confused on syllogisms.
Messages In This Thread
- Re: Syllogisms -- miffed -- 2011-12-08
Return to Index ›
Re: Syllogisms