TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re: Syllogisms
miffed - 2011-12-08

T----i posts very very regularly on this board.Mods do so too on many boards.
So,T----i must be a moderator....LOL!

Strictly spoken, this syllogism is not quite correct in formal terms

I think it falls on Material fallacies under fallacy of accident or sweeping
generalizations or under irrelevant conclusion:forwarding the proposition
under dispute without any certain proof (argumentum ad ignorantiam).
Oh maybe I myself am confused on syllogisms.

Messages In This Thread
Re: Syllogisms -- miffed -- 2011-12-08
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re: Syllogisms





Go to another board -