amused
- 2016-04-19
Your original comment was: "By revealing yourself as a woman, you may have inadvertently revealed much, much more than just your gender."
We are waiting for you to explain what being a woman reveals to you.
paul fox
- 2016-04-19
I am well aware of what my original comment was, so what do you hope to elicit from me by simply re-posting it?
amused
- 2016-04-18
Your original comment was:
"By revealing yourself as a woman, you may have inadvertently revealed much, much more than just your gender."
paul fox
- 2016-04-18
Silence is ignorance's shameful cloak.
Very poetic!
Your words are as true as the words I used to elicit your reply. However, it has nothing to do with me being 'shameful', only the fact that any attempt to elaborate further will result in deletion by the moderators, as already proved.
amused
- 2016-04-18
What, and risk being accused of stereotyping?
I thought as much. Silence is ignorance's shameful cloak.
Paul Fox
- 2016-04-18
And exactly what does a woman 'reveal' when she 'reveals' herself as a woman?
Please share your wisdom
What, and risk being accused of stereotyping?
amused
- 2016-04-18
By revealing yourself as a woman, you may have inadvertently revealed much, much more than
just your gender
And exactly what does a woman 'reveal' when she 'reveals' herself as a woman?
Please share your wisdom.
paul fox
- 2016-04-17
Misogynistic men, in my experience, are seldom western men in a happy, loving marital relationship.
It appears now that it is YOU who is 'stereotyping', along with the usual assumptions that you seem to excel at.
By revealing yourself as a woman, you may have inadvertently revealed much, much more than just your gender - and I am not being misogynistic nor sexist when I say that, (before you accuse or assume)
amused
- 2016-04-17
If you know him personally, I can understand your certainty that he is not sexist.
I do not see, however, why being married to a woman, of any race, means that a man cannot be sexist or misogynist.