TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
Return to Index › Re road rash
#1 Parent Foxy - 2016-12-27
Re: Re road rash

A thousand Chinese moving
in unison. To Western eyes it was frightening. To Chinese eyes it was majestic.

Hmm, have you ever watched 'Riverdance' or 'Lord of the Dance'? People moving in unison can sometimes be awe-inspiring as well as 'majestic'.

#2 Parent BeenThere - 2016-12-27
Re: Re road rash

"To Western eyes it was frightening": So true and so funny. So very true. I had the same feeling watching them.

#3 Parent Trump diplomacy - 2016-12-27
Re: Re road rash

Yup.
And even when they do know the answer, they don't want to be seen as showing off by raising their hand and answering in front of their classmates who may not know the answer.

This 'caring' or 'empathy' for others is admirable in some ways and when running a business or an army it is often productive. Imagine if the contributors to this forum were concerned about how their posts might seem insensitive or damaging to the 'cohesive nature' of the forum. The forum would have 75 posts a year instead of just today.

By western educational standards 'face' damages innovation and independent thought.

In learning an oral language skill, it is disastrous.

Yet much of China's rapid growth is a result of this 'consensus building'.

Remember the Chinese drummers in the opening of the 2008 Olympics? A thousand Chinese moving in unison. To Western eyes it was frightening. To Chinese eyes it was majestic.

#4 Parent Fifi - 2016-12-27
Re: Road rash

Thanks, Heretosay

#5 Parent heretosay - 2016-12-27
Re: Road rash

"So if I had the choice, I would prefer a "bad" person (whatever it means) who is kind to animals than a good person who is not."

Okay, now wait a minute. Wouldn't you be unable to call someone who is not kind to animals a good person? Which, of course, would mean that your main criteria for "goodness" is kindness to animals. I can almost agree with that. Although, I wouldn't give it as much weight as you do and it's worrisome that you may not notice the bogeyman sitting next to you who's petting his dog and kissing his cat.

I, too, by the way, am a vegetarian. I've also spent a lot of time in the woods, and love all creatures in the forest - even the ones that used to scare the hell out of me. However, if I had to eat them, I would.

I admire your passion for what you believe.

#6 Parent Foxy - 2016-12-27
Re: Re road rash

I'm not really sure of anything. But I cannot believe that freshmen college students are
lying or being lazy when they will not give a correct answer in front of the rest of the
class and will refuse to ask questions when they do not know the answer.

That is EXACTLY about 'face'. They won't answer a question in front of the class in case they are wrong and 'lose face'; they won't ask a question in front of the class because they think they will 'lose face' for not knowing the answer in the first place.

Annoying and frustrating!

Last semester I put signs up in every classroom - 'Never Be Afraid To Ask A Question', but the only time kids asked questions was after class when I was gagging for a smoke!

I get heaps of students asking questions on a one-to-one basis, but rarely in class. When I ask them why, they just go all 'sheepish' and say they don't like to...

#7 Parent Fifi - 2016-12-27
Re: Road rash

TD: I feel some hope about those two. I feel that they are (slowly) learning. But they would never admit to it of course.

#8 Parent Trump diplomacy - 2016-12-27
Re: Road rash


Yes, I may be a bit harsh now and then, and I'm sure there are those who find his rantings
and ravings amusing and/or harmless.

pDog and Daffy alone on this board express racist and misogynist points of view.

Those views are worthy of disdain.

Hitler's German Shepherd Blondi led a charmed life. Stalin even created his own breed of dogs. I guess Hitler was partial to pure bred.

#9 Parent Fifi - 2016-12-27
Re: Road rash

For me, and it's just me, I can tolerate about anything from a person who respects animals (mostly from vegetarians and vegans): They can dislike people, and that's OK with me as long as they respect animals. I am sure there would be exceptions, but that's the general principle.

A "good" person (whatever it means) who is indifferent or cruel to animals, I can't take.

So if I had the choice, I would prefer a "bad" person (whatever it means) who is kind to animals than a good person who is not.

I have been like that all my life. Not going to change, for sure.

#10 Parent heretosay - 2016-12-27
Re: Road rash

Yes, I may be a bit harsh now and then, and I'm sure there are those who find his rantings and ravings amusing and/or harmless. I just don't count myself as one of them. I will confess, however, that I could be persuaded to admit that his volumes of contributions do occasionally spark a wee bit of interest. Well, sort of like a match that one thinks is going to provide a flame but, sadly, just flickers on out.

I'm not sure SB would agree with or even appreciate your suggestion that his psyche is damaged, but I do see your point, which is that one should be more considerate, even caring, of others who haven't made it out of their angst. I'd have to give that more thought, but off the top of my head I'd say that I care less about those who haven't the time to care about others than I do about those sensible enough to recognize basic human values and to have that sensibility manifested in their lives and revealed by their writing. Moreover, I doubt seriously if SB wants me to feel sorry for him while he works on his anima.

Interesting that you brought up the notion that he, SB, likes animals. (I think that's what you meant by "good for animals.")

You see, in my mind, we could be saying he's this or that or the other thing, all bad, but it's okay because he loves animals. And I am serious about finding this interesting because it's something that's been oft on my mind lately; that is, I so often notice that people are so proud of and vocal about their love for animals/pets, yet their kindness and compassion for their fellow humans seems to be so, well, lacking.

Hope you have a happy and prosperous 2017.

#11 Parent Trump diplomacy - 2016-12-27
Re: Re road rash


"But it is certainly has nothing to do with conscious deception or refusal to take
personal responsibility."

You sure of that? Really sure?

I'm not really sure of anything. But I cannot believe that freshmen college students are lying or being lazy when they will not give a correct answer in front of the rest of the class and will refuse to ask questions when they do not know the answer.

Do Chinese ever lie or deny responsibility? Of course!

But that is not about 'face' as Chinese understand it and as Westerners cannot.

#12 Parent Arthur - 2016-12-27
Re: Re road rash

"But it is certainly has nothing to do with conscious deception or refusal to take personal responsibility."

You sure of that? Really sure?

#13 Parent Trump diplomacy - 2016-12-27
Re road rash

"face" or "losing face" ( diū liǎn) permeates many
facets of Chinese society and is not as limited as you make it out to be and has worked
quite well, from a social standpoint, for a very long time.

Individualist westerners cannot truly understand the nature of 'face' in Chinese society.

Collective consciousness, awareness of what everyone is thinking and feeling at a specific place/time is not possible in a pluralistic society. In China, when I am the only non-Chinese standing in classroom, the students all share a cultural orientation that I cannot possibly fathom.

Recognizing something exists does not qualify as understanding or experiencing it.

'Face' is intrinsic to the Chinese success at building consensus in all social activity, including their educational institutions.

It often drives me crazy given my Western beliefs in independent thought, free speech, and criticism.

But it is certainly has nothing to do with conscious deception or refusal to take personal responsibility.

#14 Parent Fifi - 2016-12-27
Re: Re road rash

Hi Heretosay
I am a big fan of your posts. But on the subject of Silverboy, I have to disagree. I have been following his posts for a long time, and I certainly do not agree with many of his red neck values, but as a person he seems to be true: He has the heart of a boy, good for animals, a bit unsure of his place in the world, trying to nurture a damaged "anima" (a Jung word that means the representation of the feminine in the psyche - conscious and unconscious - of a man) and to nurture parts of his ego, but he is true to himself. And not afraid of saying what he thinks. He might be many things but he is not a hypocrite. And he has an open mind to new ideas and to facts.

#15 Parent heretosay - 2016-12-26
Re road rash

Wrong, piglet. Just another uninformed opinion on a subject you've not bothered to research. Had you bothered to open your eyes while in China, you would now be aware that the concept of "face" or "losing face" ( diū liǎn) permeates many facets of Chinese society and is not as limited as you make it out to be and has worked quite well, from a social standpoint, for a very long time.

Of course you're hung up on the whole lying thing because your whole online persona is a fabrication. Will you lose face when your lies are revealed for what they are?

Some people lie. There are a lot of people in China. Some Chinese people lie.

Some EFL teachers in China (most I would hazard to guess think they're teaching ESL) also lie. When they're found out, they plead innocence. When they're found out to be teaching without the proper credentials, they just take their lies elsewhere. Sound familiar?

Return to Index › Re road rash





Go to another board -