Posting pictures of identifiable people online is a problem, legally and morally.

In pigD's case, he posted pictures of women whom he identified as working girls and also posted pictures of women who were models. He was not included in these photos so his relationship and knowledge of these individuals is unsubstantiated and potentially libelous.

No doubt he has little concern for the impact his 'free speech' may have on the individuals whose pictures he posted and on the owners of the site. Freedom of speech isn't 'free' for media businesses; they must defend themselves against legal action.

Google's photo service now easily identifies the sources of photos and sites where they are used.