TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
Return to Index ›
Re re: jiujiang job warning
Visas Schmisas
- 2010-11-07
Re re: jiujiang job warning
@ Turnoi, I am not disputing that it's not a government/public gig. But 4,200 is a little low isn't it? Shouldn't it be more around the 5,500 mark?
And forgive me if I am mistaken, but it said Jiujiang to me, which is NOT Nanchang, not that any teacher would really want to be in Nanchang...would they?!
Apologies if i got something wrong back there.
cheers,
VS
Return to Index ›
Re re: jiujiang job warning