how the dickens can paedophilia have any place in the argument, or the subject line?

Take a look at the entire thread, especially what I wrote - I had mentioned a pedophile who was once outed by members of this board for what he is.
Pedophilia is one form of sexual abuse, the case of the throat pervert I had mentioned is another. And there are some more, other instances.

I am always wondering about self-styled moral apostles who target Silverboy or myself only to accuse them of sexism, abuse, and whatever. It's exactly those people popping up with a big mouth from time to time but apart from writing some input they do nothing actively against it. If their determination to assist those victims targeted by the abusers was as big as their mouth, we would have had probably a bit more man/womenpower while researching the throat pervert.

I see what you mean but I think we should avoid any reference to unnatural sex and stuff....not fun any longer...do you see?