Ming
- 2013-07-06
SAN JOSE, June 3 (Xinhua) -- Chinese President Xi Jinping said here Monday that poverty elimination remains an important task of the Chinese government.
When visiting a Costa Rican family that grows coffee beans, Xi said he had been a farmer and personally knows what life is like for Chinese farmers.
"China has made a major contribution to the world by helping more than 200 million people to get rid of poverty in the past few decades alone," he said.
Poverty eradication remains a priority on the agenda of the Chinese government in the coming years because there are still many poor people in the country, Xi added.
Chatting with the 77-year-old host, Marco Tulio Zamora, Xi said this is the first time he visited the Latin American country, lauding the simplicity, hardworking and wisdom of the Costa Rican people.
Xi also noted that China and Costa Rica inked a host of cooperation deals on agricultural trade during his visit, and China is expected to import more farm produce from Costa Rica.
Zamora said it was a great honor for his family to host Xi, while his youngest son said the visit reflected the profound friendship between the Chinese and Costa Rican people.
"We will remember this day forever," said his son.
Xi arrived in Costa Rica on Sunday, the second leg of his Latin American tour, which began with Trinidad and Tobago and is to end with Mexico.
Afterwards, he will fly to the U.S. state of California to meet with U.S. President Barack Obama.
Picture: Chinese President Xi Jinping (2nd L, front) and his wife Peng Liyuan (2nd R, front) visit a local farmer's family in Costa Rica, June 3, 2013. (Xinhua/Lan Hongguang)
Beelzebub
- 2013-07-06
Nuff Said!
Best you find a sign that says "WAY OUT OF CHINA"
China’s growth has been so rapid that virtually every household has benefited significantly, fueling the steep drop in poverty. However, different people have benefited to very different extents, so that inequality has risen during the reform period. This is true for inequality in household income or consumption, as well as for inequality in important social outcomes such as health status or educational attainment. Concerning household consumption, the Gini measure of inequality increased from 0.31 at the beginning of reform to 0.45 in 2004. To some extent this rise in inequality is the natural result of the market forces that have generated the strong growth; but to some extent it is "artificial" in the sense that various government policies exacerbate the tendencies toward higher inequality, rather than mitigate them. Changes to some policies could halt or even reverse the increasing inequality.[10] (See List of countries by income equality.)
The Nobel Prize-winning economist Sir Arthur Lewis noted that "development must be inegalitarian because it does not start in every part of the economy at the same time" in 1954. China classically manifests two of the characteristics of development that Lewis had in mind: rising return to education and rural-urban migration. As an underdeveloped country, China began its reform with relatively few highly educated people, and with a small minority of the population (20%) living in cities, where labor productivity was about twice the level as in the countryside.
In pre-reform China there was very little return to education manifested in salaries. Cab drivers and college professors had similar incomes. Economic reform has created a labor market in which people can search for higher pay, and one result of this is that salaries for educated people have gone up dramatically. In the short period between 1988 and 2003, the wage returns to one additional year of schooling increased from 4% to 11%. This development initially leads to higher overall inequality, because the initial stock of educated people is small and they are concentrated at the high end of the income distribution. But if there is reasonably good access to education, then over time a greater and greater share of the population will become educated, and that will ultimately tend to reduce inequality.
The large productivity and wage gap between cities and countryside also drives a high rate of rural-urban migration. Lewis pointed out that, starting from a situation of 80% rural, the initial shift of some from low-productivity agriculture to high productivity urban employment is disequalizing. If the flow continues until the population is more than 50% urban, however, further migration is equalizing. This pattern is very evident in the history of the U.S., with inequality rising during the rapid industrialization period from 1870–1920, and then declining thereafter. So, the same market forces that have produced the rapid growth in China predictably led to higher inequality. But it is important to note that in China there are a number of government policies that exacerbate this tendency toward higher inequality and restrict some of the potential mechanisms that would normally lead to an eventual decline in inequal.
Source: Wikipedia
