You need to have evidence to accuse someone of a crime Fifi. Going on national TV and saying "Mr so and so did this to me" is not evidence.

I have been on jury trials for rape where there was no solid evidence. We had to find the accused not guilty, the judge directed us to find the accused rapist not guilty.
We had planned to anyway as the only "evidence" was a photograph of a patch of grass between two logs where a 15 year old girl said she was raped by her brother.

A photograph of a section of grass and two logs just proves that two logs and a section of grass exist. The girl did not go to the police or a doctor for six months after this alleged crime.

Way too late to collect any forensic/physical evidence. The judge slammed the police prosecutor in front of everyone and told him, "I am sick and tired of you bringing rubbish like this into my courtroom". "You are wasting my time, clogging up the courts, and wasting taxpayers money".

The judge said you can't convict someone because they "might have done it" or "could have done it". I really remember what he said.

It's 2017 Fifi, the days of the "kangaroo court" are over.