Zac
- 2004-07-14
> The phone call came to our apartment and was answered by my wife. It
> seems that making a lot of noise(as we were joking around and having
> fun) was a little too much noise for the neighbor). Sandra apaprently
> has no concept of fun or of noise that a husband and wife might
> legitimately make together since she and her "boy friend"
> chose to flaunt Chinese custom and law by living together illegally.
> Are you, Zac, the guy who would punch out someone in a bar rather
> than comfort your girl friend- or did you lie in the post where you
> said that?
> No spin- a simple yes or no would do.
You insist that you don't have a problem you probably do. Stop abusing your wife now. Treat her like a lady. If you want a reply from me.
Zac
boots43
- 2004-07-13
> Are you that teacher that was terrorizing his wife in China? 'so bad,
> that neighbours were worried for her safety and called for help.'
> No spin game. Yes and No are perfectly acceptable answers.
> Zac
I was the teacher Sandra accused of such a thing - my wife and I have both and a good laugh over Sandra's hallucinations.
boots43
- 2004-07-13
> Are you that teacher that was terrorizing his wife in China? 'so bad,
> that neighbours were worried for her safety and called for help.'
> No spin game. Yes and No are perfectly acceptable answers.
> Zac
The phone call came to our apartment and was answered by my wife. It seems that making a lot of noise(as we were joking around and having fun) was a little too much noise for the neighbor). Sandra apaprently has no concept of fun or of noise that a husband and wife might legitimately make together since she and her "boy friend" chose to flaunt Chinese custom and law by living together illegally.
Are you, Zac, the guy who would punch out someone in a bar rather than comfort your girl friend- or did you lie in the post where you said that?
No spin- a simple yes or no would do.
Zac
- 2004-07-13
> I guess that's one difference between you and me, Zac. I would never
> hit the bottle for any reason. Nor would I allow anyone to do
> anything bad to my wife. Your agreeing with Sandra - who was just
> plain wrong - doesn't help anyone. And your name-calling continues
> unabated. As far as meddling into a discussion is concerned, Zac,
> perhaps you should look up the meanings of discussion and forum-
> since that's what this is. Plus, what you said to the guy's post was
> just an ad hominem attack of him - not a real discussion at all. Zac,
> I do beleive you are having a little trouble understanding both the
> discussions and the meaning of what it meants to be a real man -
> remember, you re the on ethat brought up this whole thing of a real
> man - and said that a man protecting his wife and being emotionally
> upset by an attack on her was not a real man.
> You seem to think someone who gets in fights and will not defend his
> wife is a real man. Now onder your alleged girl friend can't even be
> an alleged wife in your posts.
> Get Help. You need it.
Are you that teacher that was terrorizing his wife in China? 'so bad, that neighbours were worried for her safety and called for help.'
No spin game. Yes and No are perfectly acceptable answers.
Zac
boots43
- 2004-07-12
> Your meddling into my discussion and lectured about the meaning of a
> real man. Just for curiosity... Sandra said, 'Rows between a teacher
> and his wife were so bad, that neighbours were worried for her safety
> and called for help.' doesn't sound any fun at all. This guy sounds
> like a real p###y. My question is: Do you know this guy? You're
> getting littler, you're shrinking! shrinking fast. Its time to hit
> the bottle.
> Zac
I guess that's one difference between you and me, Zac. I would never hit the bottle for any reason. Nor would I allow anyone to do anything bad to my wife. Your agreeing with Sandra - who was just plain wrong - doesn't help anyone. And your name-calling continues unabated. As far as meddling into a discussion is concerned, Zac, perhaps you should look up the meanings of discussion and forum- since that's what this is. Plus, what you said to the guy's post was just an ad hominem attack of him - not a real discussion at all. Zac, I do beleive you are having a little trouble understanding both the discussions and the meaning of what it meants to be a real man - remember, you re the on ethat brought up this whole thing of a real man - and said that a man protecting his wife and being emotionally upset by an attack on her was not a real man.
You seem to think someone who gets in fights and will not defend his wife is a real man. Now onder your alleged girl friend can't even be an alleged wife in your posts.
Get Help. You need it.
boots43
- 2004-07-12
> Another one! Mr. you were rude to kwako. Stop the BS.
> Zac
Zac, if everyone is disagreeing with you, maybe the problem might just be yours.
boots43
- 2004-07-12
> Zac, I thought this was a discussion board, and hence your comment
> about 'meddling in your discussion' doesn't real compute. If you want
> to have a private discussion do it via e-mail, or chat or something.
> Posts on a public board are subject to public response! Learn you
> etiquette.
> Whilst I don't always agree with Boots, he never stoops to random
> name calling as you did in your first response in this thread. If you
> want to answer his point doing so without random insults will only
> enhance your posts.
> Most of the time, though not always, I don't bother responding to a
> post if it doesn't make any point. I visit this board to share and
> gain knowledge, ask and answer questions. Name calling is a waste of
> time.
Amen, DOS.
Zac
- 2004-07-12
> Zac, I thought this was a discussion board, and hence your comment
> about 'meddling in your discussion' doesn't real compute. If you want
> to have a private discussion do it via e-mail, or chat or something.
> Posts on a public board are subject to public response! Learn you
> etiquette.
> Whilst I don't always agree with Boots, he never stoops to random
> name calling as you did in your first response in this thread. If you
> want to answer his point doing so without random insults will only
> enhance your posts.
> Most of the time, though not always, I don't bother responding to a
> post if it doesn't make any point. I visit this board to share and
> gain knowledge, ask and answer questions. Name calling is a waste of
> time.
Another one! Mr. you were rude to kwako. Stop the BS.
Zac
Dos
- 2004-07-12
Zac, I thought this was a discussion board, and hence your comment about 'meddling in your discussion' doesn't real compute. If you want to have a private discussion do it via e-mail, or chat or something. Posts on a public board are subject to public response! Learn you etiquette.
Whilst I don't always agree with Boots, he never stoops to random name calling as you did in your first response in this thread. If you want to answer his point doing so without random insults will only enhance your posts.
Most of the time, though not always, I don't bother responding to a post if it doesn't make any point. I visit this board to share and gain knowledge, ask and answer questions. Name calling is a waste of time.
> Your meddling into my discussion and lectured about the meaning of a
> real man. Just for curiosity... Sandra said, 'Rows between a teacher
> and his wife were so bad, that neighbours were worried for her safety
> and called for help.' doesn't sound any fun at all. This guy sounds
> like a real p###y. My question is: Do you know this guy? You're
> getting littler, you're shrinking! shrinking fast. Its time to hit
> the bottle.
> Zac
Zac
- 2004-07-12
> If you read any of my posts to anne and sandra, you'd realize that
> you have everything wrong - and I imagine anne and sandra are
> probably laughing at how badly you have misinterpreted what i said.
Your meddling into my discussion and lectured about the meaning of a real man. Just for curiosity... Sandra said, 'Rows between a teacher and his wife were so bad, that neighbours were worried for her safety and called for help.' doesn't sound any fun at all. This guy sounds like a real p###y. My question is: Do you know this guy? You're getting littler, you're shrinking! shrinking fast. Its time to hit the bottle.
Zac
boots43
- 2004-07-12
> Booty man: you are under Sandra's control. You're a married man
> playing with fire. I would suggest that you go back to your pathetic
> chess-less life and keep waiting for Sandra's replies.
> For Anne: you treated her unfairly. I realize it's not my place to
> say this. She deserves an apology.
> Zac
If you read any of my posts to anne and sandra, you'd realize that you have everything wrong - and I imagine anne and sandra are probably laughing at how badly you have misinterpreted what i said.
Zac
- 2004-07-12
> Zac, don't attack.
> Sandra, tell both sides of the story - if you don't know both sides,
> find out.
> Anne, they just ain't worth arguing with
> Mike B, Thanks- good to know some people think before they post
> DOS, your posts are always interesting- even though we often don't
> agree. Others could learn a lesson from you that ad hominem attacks
> are not needed to have a debate - and , in fact, end the debate and
> begin the "war".
Booty man: you are under Sandra's control. You're a married man playing with fire. I would suggest that you go back to your pathetic chess-less life and keep waiting for Sandra's replies.
For Anne: you treated her unfairly. I realize it's not my place to say this. She deserves an apology.
Zac
Zac, don't attack.
Sandra, tell both sides of the story - if you don't know both sides, find out.
Anne, they just ain't worth arguing with
Mike B, Thanks- good to know some people think before they post
DOS, your posts are always interesting- even though we often don't agree. Others could learn a lesson from you that ad hominem attacks are not needed to have a debate - and , in fact, end the debate and begin the "war".