View Thread
Return to Index ›
response - Teachers Discussion
You say they "took over $1000 USD from me". For them to have taken it from you means that at one time you had it in your possession. This suggests that the funds aren't unpaid earned compensation, or if the money was earned compensation then why did you give it back to them? WHY did you give them this money?!
In what ways, specifically, did they "break" your contract, not once, but "four diferent times" during the mere four month period you worked for them? Did you fully comply with the terms of the contract on your end? Your remarks are rather vague, generalized, and wholly unsubstantiated with any specifics, as such it is difficult to find credibility in your claims.
Lastly, what is this company, "WITT China", please? Can you provide some contact information for them?
Thank you very much for your consideration.
- Nasdaken International English - Teachers discussion -- Stacy -- 2006-04-08
- Hmmmm - Teachers Discussion -- Cian -- 2006-07-11
- I say "Hmmmmm..." also, but for different reasons - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-07-11
- Sounds like I'd sign a contract today.... - Teachers Discussion -- Rheno747 -- 2006-07-13
- Speaking of "runners"... and "happy" full timers - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-07-13
- Those annoying mindsets the powers push us to adopt - Teachers Discussion -- Rheno747 -- 2006-07-14
- More "Chinese," please... - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-07-14
- Well, to be frank again, Frank - Teachers Discussion -- Rheno747 -- 2006-07-15
- the chinese way - Teachers Discussion *Link* -- mj -- 2006-07-14
- Well, to be frank again, Frank - Teachers Discussion -- Rheno747 -- 2006-07-15
- More "Chinese," please... - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-07-14
- Those annoying mindsets the powers push us to adopt - Teachers Discussion -- Rheno747 -- 2006-07-14
- A long (and possibly pointless?) reply - Teachers Discussion -- Cian -- 2006-07-12
- Speaking of "runners"... and "happy" full timers - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-07-13
- Sounds like I'd sign a contract today.... - Teachers Discussion -- Rheno747 -- 2006-07-13
- response - Teachers Discussion -- American in Nanjing -- 2006-05-08
- Reply - Teachers Discussion -- Stacy -- 2006-05-12
- ...and another thing - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-06-04
- In support of Stacy and her statements about Nasdaken - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-06-04
- Subtle extensions of the truth - Teachers Discussion -- Martin -- 2006-08-02
- Thanks, and best wishes to you (from my "bad mouth") - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-08-04
- Keeping a watchful eye... - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-08-09
- Martin? Where For Art Thou, Martin? - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-08-17
- "Tis but thy name that is my enemy" - Teachers Discussion -- Martin -- 2006-09-06
- Martin, a reply from you -- AT LONG LAST!!! - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-09-06
- Nasdaken obviously DOESN'T CARE - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-08-24
- Websites, etc. - Teachers Discussion -- Chuck -- 2006-08-24
- "As the website turns..." - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-08-24
- "Tis but thy name that is my enemy" - Teachers Discussion -- Martin -- 2006-09-06
- Martin? Where For Art Thou, Martin? - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-08-17
- Keeping a watchful eye... - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-08-09
- Thanks, and best wishes to you (from my "bad mouth") - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-08-04
- In support of Stacy and her statements about Nasdaken - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-06-04
- ...and another thing - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-06-04
- Have you posted this warning on Raoul's site? - Teachers discussion -- Rheno747 -- 2006-04-09
- I say "Hmmmmm..." also, but for different reasons - Teachers Discussion -- Frank -- 2006-07-11
- Hmmmm - Teachers Discussion -- Cian -- 2006-07-11
View Thread
Return to Index ›
response - Teachers Discussion