TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
Return to Index ›
Re To Cunning Linguist: Is it THAT bad?
yu2fa3 - tuscan
- 2015-03-28
In response to Re To Cunning Linguist: Is it THAT bad? (San Migs)
I take it this was meant for me so I will respond.
But it was clearly not meant for me so I will also respond, hahaha! I think CL must have been a solicitor in a previous life because he does come out with some marvellously dismissive openings to get you tottering right from the offset. Only joking ,he's a good writer lol. No I agreed with your post, it was well-written also.
I was hoping that the attack launched would bring Beth back to slap the offender down. Trouble is Beth comes with a group, 'Fifi and Somebody' and if she doesn't post they also wander off too.
Got to dash, I see Dragon has deigned to post and I should read it- all crammed with humour and one-liners as is his wont I hope. hahaha! only joking lol.
Messages In This Thread
- Re To Cunning Linguist: Is it THAT bad? -- San Migs -- 2015-03-28
- Re To Cunning Linguist: Is it THAT bad? -- yu2fa3 - tuscan -- 2015-03-28
- Re To Cunning Linguist: Is it THAT bad? -- Somebody -- 2015-03-28
- Re To Cunning Linguist: Is it THAT bad? -- yu2fa3 - tuscan -- 2015-03-28
- Re To Cunning Linguist: Is it THAT bad? -- Somebody -- 2015-03-28
- Re To Cunning Linguist: Is it THAT bad? -- yu2fa3 - tuscan -- 2015-03-28
Return to Index ›
Re To Cunning Linguist: Is it THAT bad?