TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re Panama Papers
amused - 2016-04-10
In response to Re Panama Papers (paul fox)

I have a sister in Nanning, Guanxi; also Shenzhen, Guangdong; as well as Nanjing, Jiangsu;
and Chengdu, Sichuan.

Both sentences are 'grammatically correct', and as it's ME that's writing the sentence, I can
choose which one I want to write.

Even a second semicolon in a sentence separating independent clauses is a matter of grammatical dispute.
Serial semicolons separating dependent clauses, as displayed in your example, are not grammatically correct.

Messages In This Thread
Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-04
Re Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-08
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-04
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- Paul Greene -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- San Migs -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- Dubius Maximus -- 2016-04-05
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-05
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- Dubius Maximus -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-12
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- Dubius Maximus -- 2016-04-07
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-07
Re Panama Papers -- Dubius Maximus -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-08
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-09
Re Panama Papers -- Paul Greene -- 2016-04-09
Re Panama Papers -- San Migs -- 2016-04-12
Re Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-14
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-09
Re Panama Papers -- Paul Greene -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- Bleh Blah -- 2016-04-09
Re Panama Papers -- Paul Greene -- 2016-04-10
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re Panama Papers





Go to another board -