TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re Panama Papers
paul fox - 2016-04-10
In response to Re Panama Papers (amused)

That's my point entirely. Why is it not grammatically correct? Semi-colons are essentially a 'super comma', and as far as I am concerned, in British English my example of using them for clarity is accepted as being 'not wrong', so by definition, correct.

Just because we don't LIKE something, doesn't necessarily make it wrong.

Grammarians have argued for centuries over what is 'right' and 'wrong' and I am sure they will continue to do so, willn't they?

When there are arguments of validity on both sides, stating that something is 'wrong', (despite common usage), is as meaningful as saying there is/isn't a god (lower case intentionally used because I am not a 'believer')

Messages In This Thread
Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-04
Re Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-08
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-04
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- Paul Greene -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- San Migs -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- Dubius Maximus -- 2016-04-05
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-05
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- Dubius Maximus -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- paul fox -- 2016-04-12
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- Dubius Maximus -- 2016-04-07
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-07
Re Panama Papers -- Dubius Maximus -- 2016-04-11
Re Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-08
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-09
Re Panama Papers -- Paul Greene -- 2016-04-09
Re Panama Papers -- San Migs -- 2016-04-12
Re Panama Papers -- Caring -- 2016-04-14
Re Panama Papers -- amused -- 2016-04-09
Re Panama Papers -- Paul Greene -- 2016-04-10
Re Panama Papers -- Bleh Blah -- 2016-04-09
Re Panama Papers -- Paul Greene -- 2016-04-10
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re Panama Papers





Go to another board -