In response to Re Panama Papers (amused)

You are quite an amusing teacher, but you are a terrible listener. What's the topic?

There are distinctions between elements of grammar and stylistic choices and they are complex. My original comment was in specific response to 'Caring's sentence -
"The implication that suggests some of the highest ranked officials in some communist nations have stolen the wealth from people is interesting; that especially in the country where there's such a crackdown on corruption."

What we ought to fear is the GDP that has a residue of red money. The amounts of shell companies in our nations are worrying. From seemingly insignificant restaurants to listed corporations, our tax bureau legally collect from highly questionable people. Perhaps, one of my students, who's got the Residence Permit in her passport just stamped way before her graduation which is next year, would be able to explain all that to us somehow. So, let's not be amused as much.