TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
Return to Index ›
Re Faking relevance
paul fox
- 2016-05-10
In response to Re Faking relevance (PhD teacher)
But 'mei you ren bu zhi dao' is generally much stronger
Precisely.
Isn't that WHY we use double negatives in spoken English - to give stronger emphasis? (As in, 'I ain't going nowhere!')
You didn't 'upset' me either. The issue that I have is that the academics who post here will not admit when they are wrong.
The Doc made a statement saying that double negatives don't exist in Chinese.
I was merely pointing out that her statement is incorrect.
Messages In This Thread
- Re Faking relevance -- PhD teacher -- 2016-05-10
- Re Faking relevance -- paul fox -- 2016-05-10
- Re Faking relevance -- PhD teacher -- 2016-05-10
- Re Faking relevance -- paul fox -- 2016-05-10
- Re Faking relevance -- paul fox -- 2016-05-10
- Re Faking relevance -- PhD teacher -- 2016-05-10
- Re Faking relevance -- paul fox -- 2016-05-10
Return to Index ›
Re Faking relevance