TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re The new 'laws'
Former FT in China - 2016-09-03
In response to Re The new 'laws' (Paul Fox)

Foxy, no watermark(s)! Oh dear!
Not good, I guess it wouldn't be hard to produce a forgery!

Good point! Fortunately, (for me), I am in a position to be able to address that issue. Watch this space mate.........

Foxy, I shall do so, mate. Thx for whetting my appetite.

Tell a Friend REPLY View All - [To view all the posts in this thread at once click this link]
Messages In This Thread
The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-08-30
Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-08-30
Re The new 'laws' -- Sven Olafsen -- 2016-08-30
Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-08-30
Re The new 'laws' -- San Migs -- 2016-08-30
Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-08-30
Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-01
Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-09-02
Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-09-02
Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-02
Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-09-01
Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-02
Re The new 'laws' -- Paul Fox -- 2016-09-02
Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-03
Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-09-03
Re The new 'laws' -- amused -- 2016-08-30
Re The new 'laws' -- Former FT in China -- 2016-08-30
Devil's advocate.... -- Paul Fox -- 2016-08-30
Re Devil's advocate.... -- Guangxi Guy -- 2016-08-30
Re Devil's advocate.... -- San Migs -- 2016-08-30
Re Devil's advocate.... -- Former FT in China -- 2016-08-30
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re The new 'laws'





Go to another board -