TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re: The 11 tightest 2017 British general election wins
FTinPRC - 2017-06-26

The first purpose was to create a buffer between population and the selection of a President

That 'buffer' was between land/slave owning white elites and everyone else.

The buffer has never been changed because it now protects capital owning elites (a very few who are non-white and/or female).

Don't forget that the 'electors' who are 'elected' are actually party hacks chosen by other party hacks and in many instances are 'unbound': free to vote for anyone they choose.
In sum: NOT ONE COMMON CITIZEN IN THE HISTORY OF THE USA HAS EVER ACTUALLY VOTED FOR THE PRESIDENT.

Please tell your children that when they ask who you voted for.

Messages In This Thread
The 10 tightest 2017 British general election wins -- expat hubby -- 2017-06-25
Re: The 10 tightest 2017 British general election wins -- Curious -- 2017-06-25
Re: The 11 tightest 2017 British general election wins -- expat hubby -- 2017-06-25
Re: The 11 tightest 2017 British general election wins -- Curious -- 2017-06-25
Re: The 11 tightest 2017 British general election wins -- FTinPRC -- 2017-06-26
Re: The 11 tightest 2017 British general election wins -- expat hubby -- 2017-06-25
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re: The 11 tightest 2017 British general election wins





Go to another board -