Actually, I haven't responded to you because I don't appreciate your tone. Furthermore, I stated elsewhere that I don't consider the 70% figure of any relevance to the overall question of Chinese wanting to leave the country.

In regards to not entering the entire Wilkipedia definition into my post, I was trying to avoid confrontation by leaving out the pejorative aspect of the definition, but of course since you are a confrontational sort you had to include that. And besides I didn't think the rest of the definition was necessary in terms of my own response to being labeled an apologist.

Finally, you act as though I've broken some great commandment by not responding to your post. Interesting assertion in that I've yet to see your response to what USMC wrote regarding brain drain, nor have you responded to what I replied to his well written post and his meaningful research. Basically, you're so hung up on the supposed relevance of the statistics you haven't shown an ability to look beyond said "relevance." Such statistics are not the where all and end all of any discussion - they are a starting point; therefore, to answer, as you request, your simple yes/no questions would be a waste of my time. This isn't a high school debate class, it's a forum wherein ideas are exchanged.

So, I ask again: "What is your point?"