If you had to do something in your job description such as bring peace to the envirnoment, and didn't do it, then you'd be guilty for ommission of duties, because that was your responsibility. You'd be warned maybe disciplined, even lose your job.

So in consideration of Bush's move against Saddam Hussein, don't you think he would have been criticised if he did nothing?

If he was successful with no carnage he'd be Superman.

All opponents of Bush are disgusted with the amount of carnage caused, as opposed to the possibility of more carnage later with the threats of a world dictator. Put your glasses on!(short-sighted).

There are many people killed on our roads everyday-this is the price of having roads. Should we then have no roads, and then ride elephants and camels around instead, and appoint a zoo keeper as the road police?

I realise it's simplisitic, but at least he did something, and my heart does go out to the people involved in all carnage and loss of life.