Boy, are you blind!!! The attack had NOTHING to do with weapons of mass destruction, since there weren't any. There were NO links to Al-Qa'ida found. What was the rush to war? It was for a failing US economy and the need to secure the oil so America can remain a dominant country in the world...not to mention cheap oil.

Yes Saddam was bad and so is Omar Kadafi. North Korea HAS weapons of mass destruction (nuclear). Why werent they attacked???

A full UN solution could have and should have been made. Now, the best estimate is that Iraq will be in chaos if not outright civil war and ruin.

Little Georgy has the mental wit of Hitler and the ideology of the very fanatics he wants to kill. Your view is the governments hook-line-and-sinker theyve spinned: which you swallowed whole, Im afraid.

Anyway, the truth is unraveling as we speak. You can argue and argue but one only has to read the news.

To trivialize the deaths of those people as a just death for Bushs plan of democracy is insensitive of you at best and outright scary at worst, to tell you the truth. However, what you or I say won't matter, you will see that you are wrong, even with those coke bottle goggles you're wearing.

Also, notice that I didnt attack you about Clinton. Personally, I didnt like him that much. I stand on principle NOT party.

Anyway, I do appreciate that your response is a little more detailed than the rebuttal by Gumpy.