TEACHERS DISCUSSION FORUM
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re re: jiujiang job warning
Visas Schmisas - 2010-11-07

@ Turnoi, I am not disputing that it's not a government/public gig. But 4,200 is a little low isn't it? Shouldn't it be more around the 5,500 mark?

And forgive me if I am mistaken, but it said Jiujiang to me, which is NOT Nanchang, not that any teacher would really want to be in Nanchang...would they?!

Apologies if i got something wrong back there.

cheers,
VS

Messages In This Thread
Re re: jiujiang job warning -- Visas Schmisas -- 2010-11-07
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re re: jiujiang job warning





Go to another board -