Well Done DB, I'm glad to see that I am not the only reader of this forum to spot what a charlatan is the Amazing Font Of All Wisdom, who churns out responses to virtually every (if not every) topic that is proposed here.
Whilst members of the 'Rat Pack' (or should that be Rat Snake Pack), gleefully pat one another on the back for each others wondrous insight and nefarious offerings into subjects as diverse as China, English grammar and the meaning of life and everything, (readers of The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy will know that the answer to that is 42), this English speaker cringes.
Regrettably, their lack of basic English language skills, spelling ability, sentence structure and syntax, shows just what kind of pseudo pundits they really are.
One can forgive non-native speakers for mistakes in all the above failings and the odd typo., however these guys claim to be experts, and teachers to boot.!!
I am reminded of the saying "Those who cannot do, teach", and although not true in all cases, it does seem applicable to 'The gang of two, or is it three'.? (Maybe even just one using an alter ego to congratulate himself. Hmmm)

I have not, nor do I, claim to have reached the giddy heights of being a teacher, but as an interested observer, seeing the standard of my language lowered by some of those claiming to be past or present teachers, I despair. If they can't get it right, who can.? Set an example educaters, engage brain before operating keyboard !.
Even a bog standard bloke in the street like me can
see the blatant errors, so I say 'Gawd 'elp their pupils'.
As for the term 'idiot', I was taught at school that;
"If it sounds like one, talks like one, behaves like one, chances are, it is one".
On the current form of the dubious duo, I'll stand by that.