To the student...apparently your learned English well there as your posting is very good. Congrats on learning English.
Ax to grind??? I think many of the posters on here, much like other sites, have a personal issue with GLV, versus an actual issue with the overall school. Too often, these negative reviews can be traced back to poor quality teachers or teachers that have brought the difficulties upon themselves. With that said, I could never see myself working in a training school due to the hours and lack of time off they often do not provide. And, the living conditions are usually far less than what one can find when they work at a public or private school.
As for GLV, I have never worked at their center in Zhuhai. But, I have worked at their summer camp. My insight does not have the experience of their education system. And, I have little exposure to most of their staff. But, what I have experienced is a top notch facility. It is a marvelous facility with all the necessities of a training school. I know that many of their staff are apparently happy there as they have been with the company for many years. And, the school is thriving in Zhuhai, which tells anyone that it can not be a hole in the wall type of training center some posters are trying to make it out to be. The summer camp experience I have had is top notch. The facility they rent is outstanding. There is never any worries about lack of supplies. The pay for summer camp is one of the highest in China. The kids are fantastic. And, there are very few complaints by the staff from the camp.
So, when one reads about a poster on a site spewing sour grapes all over the place, perhaps some due diligence in order. This is China and they do things differently than western countries. But, from the camp experience, they are on the up and up. Yes, there are many bad training schools and shady educational systems out there. But, you will find the same thing in any country you go to. But, for the most part, my experience is that when you see a posting about a place and the reviews are negative, you need to question what motives the poster has in posting such things. More times than not, it is because of their own doing that they had a negative experience. Some people just never adapt to the Chinese environment. Chalk it up to culture shock, superiority complexes, or homeland national pride. Regardless, these people are seldom happy with their time in China.
I have been working at GLV for over a year now and my personal experiences about the school administration and the student enrollees have all been good. This is contrary to all the negative publicity written by pretenders trying to undermine the schools credibility. And I am not a shoe-in either. I have worked in different countries, taught in the university and worked in professional corporate environments in the past so i believe i have sufficient judgement to back up my statement. Salary can definitely improve but if you consider the context of English teaching in China, it's not too bad for a start. All told, thumbs up for GLV.
"And for sure, their salary is higher than 4500RMB !!"
Sadly enough they aren't. Night teachers start out at much less than that!!! Considering how much GLV charges it's students for tuition it's almost criminal what they pay their staff.
I was a teacher at GLV for 2 years, and I'd like to join others in saying that some of the disgruntled opinions expressed here are unfounded. GLV is a wonderful place to work and most students who stay a month or more say that it was an experience that changed their life.
First, the colored "ribbons" worn by students and the issue of favoritism: As other students have already pointed out, The different colored ribbons distinguish teachers, new students, old students, night-class students, and sometimes the summer youth program. These colors have absolutely no relation to the amount of money paid by students, which is standard. Students pay a flat rate per-session. There are no private lessons or other special privileges for sale. Everyone pays the same per session and no one gets special treatment. Teachers are contractually forbidden to take additional pay from students for any additional services. Naturally teachers will respond better to students who are friendly and who participate more in class, and since many teachers at GLV truly love the students and enjoy sharing meals with them in the dining hall and outside of school, they will naturally develop closer relationships to students who stay longer and participate more in class activities and school outings (all of which are included in the standard price at no additional charge).
Like anything in life, you will get out of GLV what you put into it. This goes for teachers as well as students. If a student or teacher is committed to their work and to getting all they can out of their time there, they will invest more of themselves in the school and receive dividends proportional to their investment. The only teachers I met at GLV who were unhappy were those who either really sucked at their job because they put nothing into it, or those who were more concerned with their salary than with the success of their students. Admittedly there are many places that pay teachers more than GLV, but my experience leads me to believe that this actually benefits the students, because it attracts teachers who teach because they love students and love teaching, and because it repels teachers who teach only for the money. The teachers who stay at GLV are passionate about teaching and about making a difference in the lives of their students. And many, many students have told me that their time at GLV was the best time of their life, that they came only to learn English, but learned so much more about the world and themselves, and that they built friendships that will last a lifetime. As one student told me, "I came to GLV to become a better English speaker so I can get a better job. But GLV also taught me to become a better person and make a better world."
On the issue of non-native teachers: First let me say that I am an American, born and bred in the USA, with a university degree in English, and a lover of linguistics and imitator of dialects, and students often complimented me on the clarity of my pronunciation and on my teaching. Now let me say that, though I thought myself a very qualified and effective teacher, there were several non-native teachers at my school whom I felt were considerably more qualified and more effective teachers than myself and most of the native-speaking faculty. The few native-speaking teachers whom I considered equal to these excellent non-native-speaking teachers were those who had decades of overseas teaching experience. Do native speaking teachers have an advantage in English proficiency? Absolutely! Does this make them better teachers? Not necessarily. I believe that when it comes to teaching a language, those who had to learn that language themselves as outsiders have an advantage because they understand the students better and they understand the learning process better. For us native-speakers use of our language just comes naturally and this makes it more difficult for us to see our language as foreign students do and to see how to help them grasp concepts and usages that are so embedded in us that we are barely conscious of them. Non-native-speaking teachers are more sensitive to these oddities and inconsistencies in usage, and are usually better able to explain them to other non-natives. Frankly, especially for beginning and intermediate students, I think this sensitivity and skill are of more value in teaching than native-level proficiency. Another factor that I think foreign English students and native English teachers often fail to realize is that English is a global language with more non-native speakers than native. The value of English to students like the Chinese goes way beyond just being able to communicate with Americans or Brits. It will allow them to communicate with Indians, Africans, Brazilians, Germans, Italians, Klingons (Hey, you never know, it always worked for Capt. Kirk), and people from hundreds of other countries who've learned English as a second language. It opens up the whole world to them. So whose English should they learn? Students often complained about teachers who dont have American or British accents, but there are more English speakers in India than in America, England, and Australia combined. And Chinese seeking jobs in foreign companies or wishing to start a foreign trading business are more likely to end up doing business with Indians, Nigerians, Japanese, or Malaysians than with native English speakers. So familiarity with these non-native accents and dialects is of enormous value, but even more important is the flexibility to comprehend English in all its various forms. Students greatly underestimate the value of attending a school with teachers from a variety of non-native and native-speaking countries. I believe it is this variety which is one of GLV's greatest strengths, because GLV students do not study under a single teacher, but have 4 different teachers in a single day and the opportunity, depending on the classes they choose, to study under up to 31 different teachers in a two-week term. While I was there, I worked with teachers from at least 18 different countries! (This is not even counting the visiting teacher-trainees from around the world who share the dining hall and dormitory with the students.) Where else can a student (or teacher) have the chance to be exposed to and study so many varieties of "World English?"
As for the family atmosphere, during my time there I found GLV's claims to be quite merited. The opportunity is certainly available for those who seek that, but again what you get out of it depends on what you put into it. Naturally students who stay only 2 weeks and worry about saving face more than speaking up will not be as likely to develop meaningful relationships with teachers and other students as those who stay for several months. And of course teachers who only go to class, do their job, and go home, will not feel as much a part of the "family" as those who eat in the dining hall, attend the outings, organize theme parties, and live in the dormitory. I did all those things and I felt a very strong "family" connection with the students and staff of GLV. I left China more than a year ago for family reasons, but many of my former students and members of the Chinese staff of GLV are still among my closest friends and I miss them dearly and think about them daily.
If you're a teacher who's looking for a place where you can really get to know your students and have a positive impact on their lives, and you find that more rewarding than an impressive salary, I highly recommend GLV. No school is perfect, and every administration has its flaws, but GLV is a great atmosphere for sharing perspectives and building relationships. It is truly a community of learning and I learned more from my students and colleagues there than I taught them.
Sincerely,
SuperDave
Dear Ron,
I am assuming (although its dangerous to do so) that you are a non native speaking English teacher. Would I be correct in this assumption? If I am correct, I feel the need to dismantle your claims and erect a defense (I need to look out for my dawgs).
First of all, you havent been leaving in China for 10 years; you have been living in China. That one was too easy, but misspelling eventually and other such mistakes are usually caught by a native speaker of the language. The chances are higher, considering they have dealt with these words on a much higher frequency. I didnt scan your passage for mistakes; they just jumped out at me.
I am a very meticulous person by nature, which supports the ability argument made by Choatle. I believe ability wins out, then the frequency in which you were exposed to the language, and finally self motivation to seal the deal. Dont get it twisted! Skin colour or passports dont mean a thing if you aint got that swing (another example, these phrases will more likely be familiar to a native English speaking person).
Thanks,
Cant you just find another place to argue about this stuff?
I wanted to say:
GLV is the most or one of the most expensive schools in China, thats right. But it has a great advantage for the students.
When I was a student there, last year summer, the majority were University students from rich families, who are going to send their child abroad. They all know that this is one of their last chances to learn english properly before they have to face the real english world.
So the most of them were hard working adults! They werent kids, who had been forced by their parents to attend an school during summer vacation.
In my opinion, perhaps they are exaggerating iwith this "family" stuff. But truth is, they had a nice environment! It seemed like everybody is having fun being there!
We did have different ribbons for the name tag. When you start a session, you will get a green ribbon to show other teachers and students that you are a newcomer. After 2 weeks you will change it into a yellow one, because now you are used to everything.
Teachers have blue ribbons and students who only attend evening programs have red ribbons.
There is NO colour difference between rich or poor students!
We had a nice and friendly environment, everybody was serious about studying and they werent childish. The students were mature and they helped each other and had fun together. Even one lunch with your morning teacher outside of glv is included.
Why do so many teachers stay in GLV, although they earn less money than teachers in beijing or shanghai...etc.?
They like the school, the people there and Zhuhai!
It is really not difficult to find a job in China right now, if you are an english teacher, perhaps native speaker!
And for sure, their salary is higher than 4500RMB !!
I stayed there for 6 weeks and I made a lot of great memories, further you should know that I am not a typical chinese student, who is writing this stuff, I was born in Europe and I am still living in Europe.
I was really surprised, because new oriental school, which I attended some years ago for four weeks, was not very effective. Or it was the real opposite of GLV.
I had fun, it was a nice time being there and I love Zhuhai!! Its a great place, not so big and exhausting like beijing or shanghai etc.
best wishes
H.Liu
Oh dear!...."ridicules arguement"......"level oif study "...."your talking more about technique then mastery"...."your not any more qualified "..."lie's the flaw in your arguement "....."if your not able to teach it "....."arguement ".....
So, Choatle, what you are saying is, it doesn't matter how poor your English is, your talent as a teacher will win the day?
In that case, I hope your talent is prodigious, because your English is shit!!
choatle, please arrange your jumbled thoughts. Nothing made sense to most of your posts.
I would love to see some of these studies. Honestly, this is a rather ridicules arguement. To say that, because someone is a non native speaker that they can actually teach English better than a native is absurd. One has nothing to do with the other. People who are better at teaching will teach better, it's really that simple, their ethnic background has zero to do with it. I can see where you might believe that, since it is not their first language, that they must study it with more intensity, and that that greater level oif study would lead to greater mastery. However I have to disagree with this viewpoint, your talking more about technique then mastery in real everyday use, not to mention applying an arbitrary analysis to the equation.
Let's say I was Russian, I'm not of course, but lets say I am. I speak Russian only. When I am a child of 7 or 8 my parents decide I should learn English. By the time I am 18, through careful study, and overbearing parents, I speak it reasonably well. After going to university and studying more, I speak it even better. Then I go to live abroad for a few years. After this time I speak English so well that the only thing that distinguishes me from a native speaker is my accent. Now I speak it and can teach it better, right? I can do so because I have so much more understanding, from years and years of careful study, study that westerners do not partake in. Right? Wrong.
For starters you are missing the simple fact that English is a major in American universities as well, like any other subject. Also you seem to be missing the fact that western students study English in school all the way up to their graduation from high school. Therefore I am curious, how exactly are you more qualified then someone from a western country, who speaks perfect English, and has also studied it all of their lives, and in point of fact longer then you?
I have heard this nonsense before, and usually it is spewed by the insecure non native speaker turned English teacher, plain and simple. Insecurity aside, your not any more qualified then anyone else simply because of your ethnic status, believe me. Your certainly not more qualified then someone who has studied English as their major, and is a gifted teacher.
Therein lie's the flaw in your arguement really, for all teaching is not limited to knowledge, there is also the matter of ability. If someone lacks the knowledge they can always study and get it, you don't need to go to some building and sit down with other people and read a black board to get it. Ability though, talent, can never be attained, you either have it, or you don't.
Therefore, no, your ability to speak near perfect english, your technical skill with the language, means nothing if you lack the ability to teach. What this means is that, no matter how much you know, if your not able to teach it well, who cares. Your arguement is flawed in other ways also, as I have already pointed out.
Bottom line, it is ability to teach that makes a good teacher, not your command or understanding of a subject. Those things can be gained if lacking, but talent can not, it can not be learned or aquired. That said, which is more important do you think? Precisely my point, which one is more important is rather obvious, so your arguement is spurious at best.
Hi, just wanted to make a simple note about Foriegn teachers not being native. I have been leaving in China here for 10 years.
When China understands from other countries that you have to look for qualification and not passport (as in all the rest of the world, like Hong Kong, Japan) then they will eventualy start to improve their English.
Many studies show that qualified non native speakers can teach language better than qualified native teachers.
Regarding the accent that many people want to learn. Studies show that unless someone lives in an environment that surrounds him with the language he cannot get the accent. And this is impossible after the age of five.
Ron
I couldnt agree more on the other negative reviews on GLV , please see below:
GLV ZhuHai - ESL school review
Posted By: Windward
Date: 26 May 2005
I recently saw a positive review of GLV. I feel the need to counter that opinion. GLV is a terrible place to work. This stems not only from the hours, the pay, the social restrictions and the Bahai religious beliefs that are abundant in the school, (try and get a promotion without believing) but Ping the owner of GLV is a snake. He is no better than a televangelist. In one breath he preaches how Glv is one big happy family and tells of his dream of creating self-sufficient village. Then he tells how he likes teachers that will work for a low wage in his comfortable (ever-changing) environment. While in reality its a big con. Every month the school is full and hes laughing all the way to the bank. Theres a sucker born every day and those who stay here are the proof.
Marks ESL World - The Black & White Lists Forum
GLV school in Zhuhai (Guangdong)
Posted By: Alex (218.21.128.19)
Date: Wednesday, 8 June 2005, at 6:01 a.m.
Stay away from this school!
They invite foreigners to teach on a three months tourist visa.
Who can believe theyve got the license to employ foreign teachers?
Students are paying incredible sums but teachers` salaries are low.
One can visit their site: www.glvchina.com
They are inviting teachers to work in their " wonderful village ".
Its the only site in China with pictures of the owners happy family.
They are able to do anything to get you there.
But if teachers choose to work on a tourist visa, they can be deported anytime.
http://www.englishschoolwatch.org
GLV in Zhu-Hai China is very disgusting. [CHINA]
I was a student in this school. When I was there, I felt the administration purposely created a environment that students who pay more tuition get more respects than the students paid less, they differentiated that by hanging different ribbon belt on the necks of each student, I didnt pay much, therefore I was treated like a dirt, teachers especial Chinese teachers didnt even say hello to me when we met in the hall way face to face, also between students, the ones with better color ribbon will look down on those with less expensive color. As you can see here, the atmosphere is very disgusting. As a matter of fact, the administration is very money hungry, very business oriented-----I confirmed that by checking what they charge: very very expensive. The poor students have to save for more than six months to pay for one month tuition, its nothing, but ripping off, But dont think the school will share this big money with teachers, they pay little over 3000RMB for native speakers and much less to teachers who are Chinese citizen.
Plus, they have many teachers from non-English speaking countries; I wonder how students can learn right English from people like that? These guys English is worse than mine.