So, you make a difference in degree-less Oral English teachers who are native speakers and "other" English teachers?
I have pointed out before that there isn't such a difference, an ESL teacher is either qualified or not. If someone hasn't got a degree in a relevant subject major, that person is not qualified.
You create this artificial difference to suit your own needs because you have no degree in order to pass yourself off as a "legitimate deecher of Oral English". No, you are not.
And you are not a teacher at all, neither for English nor for Chinese, and someone like you should not be allowed to work in education at all!

The most important part of being qualified in anything is your ability to do the job well; and the judgement for being qualified spells disaster for the student if it only relies on scraps of paper saying 'this man is qualified. None-native teachers often have awful accents, and that alone should disqualify. Non-native teachers get all the English upside-down, inside-out, back to front-any-which-way but right; don't they old chum? Those faults should see you applying for a job in the school toilets, hosing it down and not in the classroom. Having said that, such teachers are often paper-qualified, so measure up to what you say a good teacher should have to do a good job.