Gee, Kev, you're starting to foam at the mouth a bit. Maybe it's time to get those shots updated?
But haven't seen you on here for days now...since about the time it started being made known exactly how poorly-kept some of your poorly-kept secrets really are, perhaps?

"Raoul, teachers come to me and talk to me about their positive experiences at the school."
No doubt there are, you being a manager there and all. It happens in every workplace and mean very little in reality.

"They don't have to buy me a drink or anything."
Not sure where you keep getting this from. I've never required anyone to buy me a drink in order to talk to me about anything. I went more for hard narcotics, sexual favors, or cash.
(Joking, of course. ;-{) )

"There have been positive posts right here from teachers at SFLS (and no they are not all from me as some would have you believe). Do those count or are they all discounted because you've never heard from them?"
Well, in the first place, I haven't seen all that many of those positive posts, other than from you under various names. Others were kinda hard to swallow, just from their wording. Of course, the practice of pressuring CURRENT teachers (ahem) to say good things is very old and well-known in this business, which is why I tend to put more credence on the testimony of former teachers, who have no guns held to their heads. And, it seems reasonable to have more confidence in the word of people I actually know well, than in the writings of some unknown entity on an internet forum.
It kind of shows how totally screwed up guys like you really are: if I accept and repeat critiques of your school from strangers on the internet (which I have not done), I'm a gullible rumor-monger. If I accept years of remarkably similar gripes from former employees (or in some cases highly upset exiting current teachers) I actually know well, I'm only skimming the data and only hearing one side. But yet if I fail to blindly swallow and repeat suddenly-appearing praises of your school from strangers on the internet, I'm being selectively unfair.
This really sucks, Kev...and like all your other defensive stratagems revealed so far, you don't have a single logical leg to stand on here.

"Who exactly appointed you as "your-word-is-golden-in-Suzhou-and-everyone-else-is-a-dirty-liar-whose-postiveness-makes-you-cringe" anyway?"
Gee...I don't know. Can you cite me a post anywhere I've made such a claim? I simply said that I've lived in Suzhou a number of years, and knew a lot of people who worked at your school, and got nothing but very bad reports from all of them...and ALL these things are completely true. I haven't called anyone a dirty liar, except for you, of course. And positiveness only makes me cringe when it's false, and/or only said to further some sinister agenda.
No, this is just a clumsy bit of word-twisting and name-calling, Kev, and quite frankly you have neither the talent nor the grapes to pull it off successfully. Sorry.

As for the pork dumpling, we know of course exactly who he is and has been in the past...just as we know more about you than you are probably comfortable with us knowing. His testimony has at no point been taken at gospel (although much of it fits exactly with other accounts), and anyway his input was completely unnecessary in order to see clear through what you've been doing, including the desperately-attempted ass-coverage (pardon the expression) that you've been failing at so miserably.

Raoul