If anyone is dishonest here, it is those of you who draw conclusions and make assumptions WITHOUT ANY REAL OR FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE SITUATION. Safely hiding behind your keyboards, committing what would be called slander and defamation in the US.

You have yet to show any concrete evidence that your accusers are slandering. All you have done is dodge the accusations of exploitation and cheating teachers out of their salaries as well as their bonuses. Apparently you and your likes are [edited] enough to take this bullying attitude everywhere you go. Well maybe it's worked for you, but it won't work forever. You can get away with stuff like this in China, but just as much if you did some shyte like this in the USA there would be like 100 lawyers sending you letters of litigation. Of course you conveniently neglect to mention that. Seems like you've forgotten what it's like to live in a society that actually abides the law to a certain degree.

And you've gone and done it again... assuming guilt. I didn't dodge the accusations, I answered them... check out the entire thread, specifically my answer to Portnoi. All of your comments are based on the supposition that, what one person said is true. Why do I have to show "any concrete evidence" that the ACCUSER, there is only one, is slandering. Why doesn't HE have to provide evidence that what he says is true? You have tried and convicted Ealing without even listening to what we have to say. Congratulations. Sleep well.