In response to BUCKLAND INSTITUTE (Threads by many posters, moved from the "Travel in China" board on July 23 2012)

Clearly, there are many illiterates, here, who are not qualified to teach English. There wasn't a single grammatical error in Sara's post. If anything, this shows that the people complaining about Buckland's might actually be the bad seeds. Perhaps these people weren't really qualified to teach English in the first place, and maybe that's why they had many problems with Buckland? If they can't read or write, then maybe they goofed elsewhere.

I'm not saying Buckland is perfect. I'm just saying that it speaks poorly when the people complaining make false claims.