SCHOOLS AND RECRUITERS REVIEWS
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen
Trump diplomacy - 2017-02-14
In response to Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen (Curious)

Curious,

I appreciate the forum's ability to give voice to FTs complaints about employers in an effort to protect future hires. I also recognize an individual's right to privacy.

Recruiters and schools that misrepresent themselves as FTs doing damage control or stealth marketing are another matter; they place FTs in jeopardy by providing misinformation about China's laws and immigration policies.

I understand the site's legal concerns and desire to protect privacy.

Individuals do have a right to privacy. Schools and agencies, as businesses, are not individuals. I would humbly suggest to the board that they continue to protect individual identities, but not corporate names, such as "SeaDragon International Education, Shenzhen" which have used the site as a venue for unpaid advertising in a surreptitious manner.

Treating corporations as individuals is a concept fostered by a conservative U.S. Supreme Court. Their decisions in Citizens United and Hobby Lobby are outliers in global jurisprudence and need not be applied to companies outside of the U.S. posting on U.S. based media.

Messages In This Thread
Re [edited], Shenzhen -- Trump diplomacy -- 2017-02-13
Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen -- Curious -- 2017-02-13
Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen -- Trump diplomacy -- 2017-02-13
Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen -- Curious -- 2017-02-13
Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen -- Trump diplomacy -- 2017-02-14
Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen -- Fifi -- 2017-02-13
Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen -- Trump diplomacy -- 2017-02-13
Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen -- Fifi -- 2017-02-13
Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen -- Fifi -- 2017-02-13
Re: Re SeaDragon International Education, Shenzhen -- Trump diplomacy -- 2017-02-13
Re: Re SeaDragon International Education, Shenzhen -- Curious -- 2017-02-13
View Thread · Previous · Next Return to Index › Re: Re [edited], Shenzhen





Go to another board -