That last question is interesting - is calling a name-caller a name-caller name-calling? If someone calls another person an idiot, then they better offer a great deal of proof that the person is indeed an idiot - not just call them that.

I have no objection to arriving at a conclusion based on facts and thought, but just simply to name-call because you disagree with someone- that is not called for - so to speak.

Thanks for the Hypothetically! :)